FR EN
Field essay - Lisbon - tech geography - soft power

Lisbon and the Portuguese paradox.

Portugal is still marked by emigration. But Lisbon now concentrates a new kind of desirability, carried by culture, tech, mobility and the idea that another life might be built here.

36.1Mpassengers at Lisbon airport2025, ANA/VINCI
29.0Mnon-resident tourists2024, INE
72KErasmus+ participants linked to Portugal2024, European Commission
#7Global Peace IndexPortugal, 2024

For a long time, I could not picture myself living in Portugal.

This is not an attempt to prove a theory. It is an attempt to understand how a country long associated with departure can also become a place people project themselves into.

Every summer, after the holidays, my parents would ask more or less the same question: what if we moved back to Portugal? I would cry. My life was in France. My friends were in France. My school, my routines, my imagined future were in France. Portugal, for me, was family and summer. It was not a place where I could seriously picture a life.

I have now lived here for ten years. And maybe that is where the Portuguese paradox begins for me: the country where I once could not imagine living has become a place where many young Franco-Portuguese people, and now many Europeans with no family connection to Portugal at all, are beginning to project themselves. Portugal used to be, above all, a country people left. Today, it is also becoming a country people choose. That reversal is what interests me.

I felt it again recently at Yard festival. Many foreign festival-goers kept asking the same question: what is it like to live here? Not only what is the party like, or the beach, or the night. What is life like. You could feel the projection arrive almost immediately.

Online, it is even more direct. A story from Caparica, Marvila or a rooftop by the Tagus is often enough to trigger the same messages: where is this? What is life like there? Is it really like that?

I do not want to overplay my personal story. It only explains my angle. I am the son of Portuguese immigrants, I grew up in France, and I now live in the country my family once left. That intimate displacement makes the reversal easier for me to see.

So the question is simple: how did a country long seen as peripheral, sometimes as slightly behind, become desirable enough for Lisbon to concentrate so many projections?

1

Visual Capital

The city produces images that travel easily: light, facades, miradouros, beaches, rooftops, clubs, old factories. Its ability to be photographed and shared becomes a resource.

2

Residential Projection

The images do not only make people want to visit. They allow some people to imagine living here: working, going out, meeting people, building a routine.

3

Usable Quality of Life

The projection holds because it seems practical: safety, climate, direct flights, coworking spaces, English, nearby beaches, culture, remote work. It is not only beautiful. It can be used.

Work has not disappeared from the equation. But in a more mobile service economy, place enters the decision earlier.

Portugal was already present in the world. But that presence did not yet look like Lisbon.

Lisbon's current story did not appear from nowhere. Before the rooftops, festivals and coworking spaces, there was already a language, a diaspora, a Lusophone world and an international image of Portugal.

For a long time, Portugal carried the image of a peripheral country: poorer, more religious, slower, sometimes almost frozen in time. A country of holidays, family villages and houses closed for part of the year. Rarely a place where a young international life was imagined.

What has changed is not that this image disappeared. It is that it now coexists with another one: Portugal as desirable again, almost aspirational, carried by Lisbon, safety, light, culture, tech and a quality of life that has become visible.

But the country was never invisible. Portuguese circulates across several continents, spoken by more than 265 million people according to UNESCO. The CPLP now brings together nine member states. Behind this, there is also a violent, sad colonial history that cannot be romanticised, but that still structures links, movements, families, imaginations and ways of relating to the world.

There is also the diaspora. The latest estimates from the Observatorio da Emigracao point to around 1.8 million Portuguese-born people living abroad in 2024. If descendants are included, the Portuguese government regularly speaks of a community of around five million people, almost half the population of Portugal itself. In France, depending on definitions, the Portuguese and Luso-descendant community is often estimated at around one million people. These people did not simply leave. They tell the country, return to it, sometimes invest in it, and bring friends, partners and colleagues with them. Often without intending to, they became ordinary ambassadors.

Add football, diplomacy, a reputation for calm and safety, and public policies that became international reference points, such as drug decriminalisation. None of this made Portugal a major economic power. But it gave the country presence. The shift today is that this presence is becoming urban. It increasingly takes the face of Lisbon.

01 - language and the Lusophone world

The language gave Portugal a global presence.

This is not only a question of size. It is a historical, cultural and family geography.

02 - popular culture

Portugal already travelled through recognisable signs.

Not only through major institutions. Also through football, taste and the Atlantic.

03 - public image

Portugal also projected a kind of calm.

Not spectacular power. More a legible, moderate, relatively safe country, easy to place mentally.

The feeling leaves traces, not proof.

Soft power is hard to measure directly. But the conditions around Lisbon have changed: air access, foreign settlement, Erasmus+ circulation and a baseline of safety all make the city easier to choose.

Three measurable traces of a city becoming easier to choose

Access, mobility, settlement: these indicators do not prove aspiration, but they show that more people can now test it.

Three traces, three scales

Lisbon is above its pre-Covid airport traffic; foreign residents have grown much faster; Erasmus+ points to more visible youth circulation.

The data cannot tell us why someone imagines a life in Lisbon. It only shows that access, circulation and settlement have become more visible.

This is where observation matters. Lisbon gives people a lot to project onto: a sunset in Caparica, a steep street, a rooftop, a festival poster, a cafe where everyone is working in English, an old factory turned into a night venue.

All of this circulates quickly. In stories, WhatsApp messages, playlists, TikTok videos, Airbnb recommendations, coworking conversations. Often, the city arrives before the trip. It has already been seen, saved, imagined.

This is not proof that Lisbon is better than elsewhere. It is simply a reality of our time: some cities are easier to tell than others.

What matters is not whether the image is perfectly accurate. It is that it makes people want to verify it. And today, many more people can verify it quickly: a flight, a stay, a month of remote work, then sometimes a move.

The decisive shift is not lifestyle. It is portability.

Lisbon stops being only a cultural story when part of work becomes mobile enough to turn desire into a decision.

In a service economy, not everyone has to be in the same place as the factory, the headquarters or the client. Cloud engineers, consultants, founders, freelancers and remote employees can keep part of their income while changing the frame of their life.

This is where technology changes the subject. Async organisations, the cloud, distributed teams, nearshore ecosystems and portable careers allow enough people to treat location as part of the overall package.

At the anniversary of my coworking space at IDEA Spaces, English had become the dominant language in the room. More than half the people there were not Portuguese. Of course, I know this is a bubble. But bubbles matter when they begin to reshape the social texture of a city.

Lisbon does not need to offer London salaries to enter the decision-making process of certain mobile workers. It mainly needs to be compatible with their work, their income, their networks and the life they want to test.

Portable careers

Many high-value roles no longer require permanent proximity to headquarters. Geography becomes negotiable.

Async organisations

Distributed work brings rhythm, time zone, safety and lifestyle into the economic decision.

Nearshore Europe

Portugal can become a credible base for European delivery, consulting, product teams and founder networks.

Miradouro Map

An interactive map of the venues, scenes, campuses and hybrid spaces shaping Lisbon's cultural geography. Pick a layer, then explore the addresses.

The maps are not decorative. They show where projection becomes physical.

A city does not become desirable in the abstract. It needs addresses: venues, festivals, clubs, coworking spaces, hybrid beaches, old factories, districts under construction. The maps show where that feeling materialises.

Caparica may tell this story better than almost anywhere else. Ten years ago, many Lisboetas still saw it mainly as a beach escape. Today, the coast increasingly works as a social, economic and cultural extension of the city.

In just a few years, MOGA, Yard, SunceBeat and DHB have appeared or intensified along the Atlantic. Aura, Irmao, Princesa and Hangar have become hybrid lifestyle infrastructures. The beach is no longer only leisure. It has become a permanent background for projection.

Marvila tells another version of the same story. Old warehouses become clubs, breweries, galleries, coworking spaces and music venues, without the district having fully found its model yet. That ambiguity matters. Lisbon itself still feels unfinished: not a perfect city, but a city becoming something.

Ten or fifteen years ago, after the financial crisis and the years of austerity, parts of Lisbon still felt tired, sometimes almost abandoned. Today, from almost any miradouro, you also see cranes, scaffolding and buildings being renovated. The transformation is visible, but it also reveals the central problem: not enough housing, not enough construction labour, prices rising faster than wages.

This cultural energy eventually reached me too: it made me want to become a DJ and build Kombava with friends.

Cultural Infrastructure

Concerts, festivals, clubs, coworking spaces, campuses and transforming districts. A sociological map of the places where aspiration gets staged.

places
Coastal Extension

The beach sits inside the Lisbon story. Coworks, campuses and coastal venues extend that story across the south bank.

places

Desirability creates value. Then it creates pressure.

The point is not to say that Lisbon has become amazing. The point is that it attracts more people at the very moment when it becomes harder to inhabit.

A projection economy can enrich a city while making it harder for the people who already live there. Housing pressure, tourism pressure, expat economies, salary gaps, strained neighbourhoods and cultural fragmentation are not footnotes. They are part of the model.

Alfama makes this tension visible. The historic birthplace of fado sometimes survives more as an aesthetic symbol for visitors than as a living social fabric. Tascas disappear. Short-term rentals multiply. Some streets feel less inhabited than staged.

Even some newcomers are beginning to feel that discomfort. A Guardian article republished by Atlas Lisboa recently asked whether some digital nomads should leave Lisbon: not only because the city is changing, but because they sometimes feel they are living inside a bubble they are helping to create.

And yet traces remain. During Santo Antonio in June, parts of Lisbon temporarily escape platform logic. The city becomes local again: louder, messier, more Portuguese. These moments matter because they reveal what is at stake.

The resident economy and the projection economy do not always want the same things. One needs continuity, bearable rents, schools, repairs, calm, ordinary services. The other often wants atmosphere, access, novelty and a filtered version of urban life.

1
Housing pressure

Desirability becomes rent, distance and trade-offs.

2
Fragmentation

International energy does not always produce shared civic life.

3
Tourism load

The city can optimise for arrival at the expense of continuity.

4
Model fragility

An infrastructure of aspiration still has to become durable structure.

The questions then become practical. Can Lisbon convert attention into housing, better jobs and institutions? Can cultural energy build belonging rather than decorate inflation?

And if Portugal became desirable before becoming powerful, what kind of power is actually being built?

Can the Portuguese paradox become a durable structure?

We may be watching the emergence of a new kind of European city.

Not a capital of production in the old sense. Not simply a tourism machine either. Something more contemporary: a city whose economic relevance is also built through atmosphere, safety, culture, remote work and the desire to live differently.

I do not know whether this model can last. I am not even sure Lisbon knows. But the transformation is visible enough to name, and ambiguous enough to take seriously.

Maybe that is why writing about Portugal today still feels strange to me. A country I once associated with departure has become a place where others imagine arrival.

Portugal became desirable before it became powerful. The next question is whether that desirability can build institutions, housing, opportunities and belonging strong enough to outlast projection.

What I still cannot fully settle.

Can Lisbon turn this desirability into better opportunities for the Portuguese people who already live there?

Porto, Braga, Aveiro and Coimbra already capture part of this energy. Can they absorb more of it, or will Lisbon continue to concentrate most of the projection?

Can the Portuguese diaspora become more than an emotional link to the country: a real network of investment, talent and cultural circulation?

Most importantly: can the Portuguese paradox become a real economic, social and urban structure, or will it remain a contradiction concentrated around Lisbon?

Sources and notes preserved from the V3 version

  1. Lisbon airport passengers: ANA annual reports and ANA/VINCI Airports reporting. The 2025 figure used here is 36.1 million passengers.
  2. Chart notes: airport passengers include tourists, residents, connections, business trips and family visits. Erasmus+ measures student and youth circulation, not settlement. Foreign residents are the closest signal to settlement, but they do not say why people come.
  3. Tourism: INE Tourism Statistics and Turismo de Portugal TravelBI. The chart uses non-resident tourist arrivals where available, including 22.8M in 2018, 24.6M in 2019, 26.5M in 2023 and 29.0M in 2024.
  4. Erasmus+: annual Erasmus+ reporting from the European Commission for participants linked to Portugal, unless later clarified toward higher education only.
  5. Global Peace Index: Institute for Economics & Peace, Portugal ranking used in the V3 version.
  6. Portuguese language and the Lusophone world: UNESCO World Portuguese Language Day for the order of magnitude of speakers, and CPLP / Turismo de Portugal for the member states of the Community of Portuguese Language Countries.
  7. Portuguese diaspora: Observatorio da Emigracao for the estimate of around 1.8 million Portuguese emigrants in 2024; Portuguese government for the order of magnitude of around five million Portuguese and descendants abroad; INED for the order of magnitude of around one million people in the Portuguese community in France, depending on definition.
  8. Drug policy: international references including EUDA / EMCDDA work and literature on Portuguese decriminalisation.
  9. Expat / digital nomad tension: Guardian article republished by Atlas Lisboa, July 2025, used as an editorial signal rather than a statistical measure.
  10. The maps are interpretive editorial maps. Place coordinates are approximate and serve sociological reading, not cadastral precision.